q 0 0 0 1 k /CS2 cs 1 scn (2013). 0.15 scn 378.7765 101.9726 l 452.1942 368.7161 451.9885 364.9133 451.2689 361.4194 c 418.4856 140.2584 l 292.1956 94.3046 l 318.5006 94.2636 319.2404 94.9956 320.255 94.9956 c 9.21939 0.00001 TD 244.0648 97.4126 l (patient evaluation \(i.e. q 396.2871 92.0596 395.876 86.0987 396.3901 81.8854 c 2.655 -1.21428 TD /GS2 gs Philanthropic support truly drives our mission and vision. /GS3 gs /GS3 gs /F2 1 Tf 326.9757 101.5742 326.1856 102.27 326.1856 103.2417 c 41.538 0 0 40.187 240.5686 623.1415 Tm /F1 1 Tf /GS3 gs 276.8424 82.3061 277.1385 82.8662 277.1385 83.4902 c It uses the DASH scale and scoring method and allows for one missing response . 395.5681 83.016 395.3623 76.3357 393.1016 71.3002 c 334.7262 91.958 l 0 0 0 1 k 12 0 0 12 53.0917 265.8855 Tm q 239.6576 96.2597 239.3822 96.2597 v 361.13 104.9379 l 358.6876 102.4077 359.3546 101.9003 360.0724 101.9003 c 408.3114 207.7784 409.9556 216 409.5447 224.8381 c 400.2952 267.1793 400.3979 262.349 399.8842 256.6965 c 0.78461 0 Td 290.1556 96.3847 l 279.8427 82.3784 l 336.1544 81.9428 l 343.5495 104.3071 m 12.76105 0.00001 TD f There was a significant interaction between groups for the pretest and post-test scores, indicating that the change in QuickDASH with time differed between stable and improved patients. 393.2043 166.6704 l /CS1 CS 1 SCN 416.8413 145.9109 419.7189 142.1086 416.5329 140.2584 c 422.4938 377.8624 m 322.8727 103.1547 325.2433 103.9521 325.2506 102.5092 c 1 g 373.9863 78.5968 373.7805 85.0712 372.0338 89.9016 c The effects of corticosteroid injection versus local anesthetic injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 133(6): 757-763. 273.8583 101.7104 274.2743 101.7421 274.2743 102.0781 c 294.028 94.3046 l 278.6666 104.8144 m T* 373.6652 94.2417 374.4268 94.9956 375.4562 94.9956 c Q 0.5 w 290.1873 106.0947 l Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. I give my consent to Physiopedia to be in touch with me via email using the information I have provided in this form for the purpose of news, updates and marketing. 332.254 91.958 l 340.983 91.6318 m f 390.7379 493.1705 388.8877 498.4113 387.5518 504.0638 c 331.3185 84.582 l Shirley Ryan AbilityLab does not provide emergency medical services. 383.3385 131.9343 384.2633 130.9063 385.4966 130.3925 c 238.1764 96.2597 l 450.5499 380.0204 452.3994 377.965 452.8106 375.7044 c 467.3014 490.7036 461.2378 496.2533 456.0993 501.4947 c f "Performance characteristics of the verbal QuickDASH." 316.9855 86.5029 l 430.8179 331.7189 431.4347 330.8969 431.1263 330.5883 c 277.8746 104.8144 l 372.0421 96.54 l -0.0001 Tc 268.3859 94.3764 m 362.8488 94.4301 362.5079 94.6694 362.1602 94.6694 c Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire 449.2136 352.2727 449.522 351.0395 449.1109 350.32 c 385.5343 104.6845 384.8956 104.1552 384.8165 103.4736 c 0 Tw 298.4843 96.2168 298.2841 96.4648 297.9401 96.4648 c -0.0002 Tc )]TJ Patients with a Quick-DASH score below 15 could be considered totally recovered, and patients with a Quick-DASH score above 40 could be . 392.279 151.1521 392.3822 139.4362 392.0738 129.879 c 387.5518 203.2565 390.4294 215.7943 391.6627 228.3325 c /F13 1 Tf /CS2 cs 1 scn (The highest-ranking)Tj 1-844-355-ABLE, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab #1 Rehabilitation Hospital. 326.5412 84.9082 l T* 315.0352 106.8808 l 475.5228 630.1625 477.6808 630.4709 479.8394 629.854 c 0.88702 0 TD 336.234 91.958 l (items that r)Tj 405.8451 544.4522 405.6393 533.6614 402.1453 524.2068 c Nakamoto, H., Y. Oshima, et al. "Usefulness of QuickDASH in patients with cervical laminoplasty." /F2 1 Tf 396.2871 221.5495 396.9039 230.0794 399.0621 237.2734 c [(patients \(r)20(esear)39(ch studies, pr)20(ogram)]TJ (Change in those rating their)Tj (Psychometric Properties)Tj 238.2201 96.1469 240.4262 90.3295 241.4633 87.5952 c 361.1593 103.8359 m ET BT 315.9708 81.9643 l -0.0001 Tc h 0.026 Tw (version of the )Tj Quick Dash Calculator Form - Fill Out and Sign Printable PDF Template /GS2 gs 328.1939 91.559 327.3673 92.2045 327.3673 93.3281 c 253.2826 97.4126 l /F10 1 Tf 283.0031 97.1445 l A higher scor)20(e indicates)]TJ Q 314.4191 86.851 l Q 367.6768 94.3071 l 391.971 154.7491 391.3542 156.9072 391.7653 159.7847 c q ET (\(i.e. 376.6818 104.3071 m q [(individuals may be having dif)10(ficulties)]TJ 355.6349 104.9379 l /GS2 gs 326.5412 81.6167 l (Fax: (416) 927-4167)Tj 313.7882 91.9794 l 0 Tw f [(scor)20(e out of 100 by subtracting one and)]TJ (The )Tj -0.51885 -1.30001 TD -0.0002 Tc 357.6652 101.9726 l 369.7863 91.8852 370.3663 92.458 370.3663 93.3066 c /F1 1 Tf (be able to calculate a )Tj 10 0 0 10 408 646.6965 Tm 456.2023 356.5891 m 422.1852 104.7002 422.0827 100.2811 421.2605 96.8898 c f 380.1251 94.9233 l 355.7433 91.9794 l 370.3663 94.0312 369.7365 94.6694 369.004 94.6694 c 2173)Tj 406.256 92.4707 403.9949 91.0316 403.6868 92.6761 c ET 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v /F0 1 Tf 331.3766 91.958 l Tj 266.6737 104.0546 l /GS3 gs The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure: what do we know about it now?. 0 Tc /GS2 gs 392.1764 171.7063 393.9238 172.4255 394.9513 173.0422 c 312.7804 81.9643 l 0 -2.02 TD q /CS2 CS 1 SCN 0 Tw /GS2 gs That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated. 398.7536 108.6057 398.2398 110.4553 398.0346 113.0244 c ET Kennedy, C., D. Beaton, et al. 0.026 Tw 280.7628 82.3784 l 349.7916 91.8852 m )]TJ 270.538 83.2026 m 285.6434 95.1445 286.4994 94.3764 286.4994 93.2163 c 0.028 Tw 317.3917 91.9794 l 12 0 0 12 53.0917 565.1384 Tm 387.4913 94.6694 386.8536 94.1401 386.7736 93.4585 c 248.7897 90.4638 250.9357 96.1494 250.9777 96.2597 c 14 0 0 14 268.4509 592.0247 Tm 277.2265 104.8144 l BT 0 -1.3 TD 283.923 82.3383 l Q (Quick)Tj -7.9177 -1.3 TD 290.6434 101.0942 290.2675 101.038 290.1234 101.038 c 405.5365 110.1469 407.1809 110.558 408.6198 110.4553 c (is)Tj 396.2871 80.3438 396.2871 77.8773 395.9792 75.7193 c [(Thr)20(ee distinct )]TJ /F12 1 Tf ET 319.0734 104.6845 318.4357 104.1552 318.3556 103.4736 c 10 0 0 10 36 245.76 Tm 257.483 96.2573 l 0 -1.30001 TD BT /GS2 gs 0.026 Tw f 277.7626 93.1123 l (1)Tj 286.2752 85.0024 286.4752 85.1464 286.6913 85.2426 c 266.0497 87.3945 l /F0 1 Tf 329.5929 94.9956 330.1154 94.7636 330.4415 94.3286 c 14 0 0 14 111.8256 737.0585 Tm ET A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions." 332.254 94.5971 l ET /F2 1 Tf The change in QuickDASH score did not correlate with the change in extension deficit. 0.67351 0 Td 398.3426 124.3291 397.9314 124.1238 397.4176 124.0208 c 349.3215 126.7957 354.6655 130.4953 356.2071 135.7366 c 404.8171 219.2884 403.4813 215.7943 403.4813 211.7864 c 330.4196 81.6167 330.2819 81.6528 330.2819 82.2402 c Q f q 0.032 Tw Q 480.1473 571.7892 479.7362 555.5516 480.4557 542.1914 c 452.3994 427.8087 451.0636 433.769 447.1582 438.5993 c 335.422 101.9726 l 281.099 96.3608 l It uses the DASH scoring method on a 0-4 Likert scale and allows for one missing response (Figure 1). 317.9933 104.271 318.7979 105.0107 319.8126 105.0107 c T* /GS3 gs ET A Young Scientist's Journey after a Stroke, Care by the Numbers: Skilled Nursing versus Inpatient Rehabilitation, WSJ: Recognizing Aphasia and Seeking Treatment, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Ranked No. 401.9395 166.5676 m (one r)Tj 252.129 96.2597 l (to impr)Tj 5.877 0 TD 379.0744 94.9233 l q 286.6751 81.6181 l 343.4113 94.5971 l 376.9666 92.2649 378.2 92.1623 378.9192 92.0596 c ET T* 430.7152 373.0321 428.454 378.1707 427.6319 383.4121 c f 317.609 86.5029 l h [(in 1996. 10 0 0 10 109.5662 429.3 Tm Q 454.969 414.5511 452.708 417.7371 451.4747 421.0258 c s f (All Pearson pr)Tj (item )Tj ET (Conceptual Method)Tj Q 0 -1.3 TD (optional modules because each module)Tj 241.4633 99.1704 l 285.3551 102.5502 l T* 235.7345 96.2597 234.2794 96.2597 y 10 0 0 10 63.8917 444.8636 Tm 389.8126 578.058 391.971 584.3269 394.4376 590.8015 c 327.3527 81.6167 l Q 0.026 Tw 279.1869 94.9126 l 282.411 84.5546 l and Klum et al. 253.2826 97.6328 253.2826 97.4126 v For example, if a patient an-swered 2, or Mild Difficulty, to all 30 ques-tions, the raw score would be 60. 0.72857 0 Td BT /F1 1 Tf 1 g 273.5543 104.8945 273.8663 104.8066 274.1222 104.6147 c 336.5963 104.6845 336.3859 104.0175 336.3859 103.5532 c S Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Gabel (2009; n=137; mean age=48.4(15.6) years; with clinician referral): SEM=7.38, Polson (2010; n=35; mean age=48.7(15.7) years): MDC=11, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Fan (2008; n=231; mean age=39.5(0.5) years; clinical diagnosis or symptoms present): MCID=10, Gabel (2009):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Polson (2010):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Gummesson (2006; n=105; mean age=52; symptoms more than 2 months):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.93), Franchignoni (2011; n=283; mean age=52.3(15.9) years):Excellentitem separation reliability (ICC=0.99), Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist Arthroplasty Patients, Angst (2009; n=320):Excellenttest-retest reliability(ICC=0.93), Gummesson (2006):Excellentinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.92), Franchignoni (2011):Goodinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.87), Angst (2009):Excellentinternal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.92, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Moderatecorrelation with PCS-12 (r=-0.44), Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006). 0 0 0 1 k let the examiners self-assess their own work as manual or non-manual, and Klum et al . Original Editor - Nicole Wente as part of the Temple University EBP Project, Top Contributors - Nicole Wente, Admin, Rachael Lowe, Kim Jackson, Abbey Wright, Scott A Burns, Laura Ritchie, Rucha Gadgil, Lauren Lopez, Tony Lowe, Evan Thomas, Scott Buxton, WikiSysop, Claire Knott and Robin Tacchetti, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities. Thanks for helping us invest in our patients. 2 w Measuring the whole or the parts? [(population, clinical setting or tr)20(eatment)]TJ 241.4647 89.3637 l 434.5175 453.7064 m 10 0 0 10 408 704.246 Tm 277.8746 104.0546 l 412.628 146.6304 412.8332 142.4169 415.4023 139.1283 c 350.5309 101.9946 l 409.5447 606.9363 413.45 606.8337 417.1497 608.6834 c /GS2 gs -13.85108 -1.30001 TD q 267.6339 94.3764 267.3138 93.7924 267.3138 93.2163 c 270.578 101.8784 l DASH are added to form the raw, or ac-tual, score. 386.6271 87.6404 384.7771 94.6287 386.3187 102.028 c 391.56 128.9537 390.7379 130.0842 389.9158 129.879 c 312.7804 106.8808 l 364.6251 101.9003 365.1104 102.1543 365.3859 102.5673 c 399.6789 180.1331 399.3705 177.0504 399.4731 174.3781 c 0.026 Tw 10 0 0 10 36 612.7 Tm ET 0 0 0 1 k 376.3195 104.6118 l T* 361.0147 104.3579 360.6007 104.6845 360.0499 104.6845 c BT 333.9943 101.9726 m 343.8976 104.7641 344.3976 105.0107 344.8468 105.0107 c 383.9549 152.077 m f /F2 1 Tf 383.1193 104.3579 382.7061 104.6845 382.1554 104.6845 c 321.9371 91.958 l 380.1251 94.5971 l f 281.8668 84.5546 l 319.2833 91.559 318.5006 92.2915 318.5006 93.2412 c 417.7661 149.0967 419.102 147.9662 418.8967 146.5277 c